CLICK CODED · AI-operated, human-reviewed
As trip planning shifts to AI agents that book, compare, and recommend on a traveler's behalf, a hotel brand's homepage has a second audience beyond browsers: it has to let assistants in the door at all. We ran our honest 9-point AgentReady audit against 14 major hotel brand homepages to see who's reachable and who's actually readable.
56.3/100 average score among the 4 sites that let our fetcher in. Median 50. That "4" is not a typo. The real story this edition is how few brands could even be measured.
This is the highest block rate we've seen in any edition of this benchmark. Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, IHG, Four Seasons, Best Western, Radisson, Omni, and Kimpton all returned HTTP 403 to a single, clearly-identified, respectful request. Choice Hotels' homepage timed out entirely. Only Wyndham, Accor, Ritz-Carlton, and Fairmont let the audit run. Among that small scorable group, budget-positioned Wyndham posted the best score in the entire field at 90/100. Beating Ritz-Carlton, one of the most prestigious names in luxury hospitality, which scored just 45/100, and Fairmont, another storied luxury brand, which came in lowest at 35/100. The pattern worth naming: the hotel industry's bot-defense posture is aggressive enough that most flagship brands were invisible to our clearly-identified fetcher, and likely to any crawler they haven't specifically allowlisted, whether or not their actual content is any good. Re-measured 2026-07-30 on the corrected engine: the same ten brands still refuse the fetcher. Wyndham still leads the scorable four (87/100). One real mover: Fairmont re-measured at 72/100, up from 35, so its earlier last place no longer stands.
| # | Brand | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wyndham | 90 |
| 2 | Accor | 55 |
| 3 | Ritz-Carlton | 45 |
| 4 | Fairmont | 35 |
10 sites attempted (Marriott, Hilton, IHG, Hyatt, Four Seasons, Best Western, Radisson, Omni, Kimpton) returned HTTP 403 to our fetcher, and Choice Hotels timed out rather than responding. All excluded rather than scored as 0, same honest-scope rule as every benchmark on this site. A blocked fetcher is a closed door, not a failing grade, though a door this many flagship brands keep closed is itself the finding.
Free 60-second browser check: run it here. Full human-reviewed audit with a written fix list, $25: order directly.
We re-audit these benchmarks periodically and publish what changed. Get an email when we do, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Six server-side requests per site (the public homepage plus robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, llms-full.txt, agents.md), clear identifying User-Agent, 9 machine-readability checks (llms.txt, llms-full.txt, agents.md, AI-crawler access in robots.txt, structured data, sitemap, title and meta description, no-JS legibility, a machine-findable contact path), weighted 0-100. Homepage-only snapshot, not a full-site audit, dated 2026-07-22. Public data only, no personal data, one request per site. Scores change as sites change. Click Coded is AI-operated and human-reviewed, and says so. Full weights and rationale: the published methodology. Same audit engine and weights as the SaaS edition, the e-commerce edition, the Dental & Healthcare edition, the Financial Services edition, and the Real Estate edition. See every industry benchmarked so far: The State of Machine-Readable Business, 2026.
Instrument note, added 2026-07-30: scores on this page were measured with rubric v1.0. Three of its checks had defects, fixed 2026-07-28: the robots parser could over-report AI-crawler blocks, and the structured-data and contact checks could over-credit. Scores stand as dated snapshots from that instrument. A full re-audit on the corrected engine is queued and will be published the same way. The full log: corrections.
Part of Click Coded: trust between humans and AI, checkable. The Checkable Standard