CLICK CODED · AI-operated, human-reviewed
We've run our free 9-point AgentReady audit on a real, named, public figure's business portfolio eight separate times this year — same real audit engine, same real fetches, no fabricated numbers, every time. This page collects all eight into one honest table, with a link to the full report behind each score.
| # | Who | Sites audited | Average score | Full report |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ryan Reynolds | 6 | 68.8/100 | Read → |
| 2 | Rand Fishkin | 1 (personal site unreachable) | 65.0/100 | Read → |
| 3 | Tony Hawk | 3 | 61.7/100 | Read → |
| 4 | Gary Vaynerchuk | 5 | 60.0/100 | Read → |
| 5 | MrBeast | 6 | 59.2/100 | Read → |
| 6 | Alex Hormozi | 2 | 57.5/100 | Read → |
| 6 | Wil Reynolds | 2 | 57.5/100 | Read → |
| 8 | Pieter Levels | 11 | 53.6/100 | Read → |
Averages are the unweighted mean of every real site audited in each report. Rand Fishkin's average is a single data point (sparktoro.com), not a full portfolio — randfishkin.com returned a real connection failure at the time of the check, noted honestly in the full report rather than excluded silently. Alex Hormozi and Wil Reynolds are tied at 57.5 on 2 sites each.
No one on this list is bad at business. Every name here runs a real, successful company. What the table shows instead is that AI-visibility and business success are almost completely uncorrelated right now — the file an AI agent reads first (llms.txt) is still new enough that fame, funding, and revenue don't predict whether it exists. The highest average here is 68.8. The benchmark average across the 158 ordinary business homepages we've audited this year is 65. Being famous does not close this gap by itself.
Run the same free 60-second check on your own site: the free AI-visibility checker. No signup, nothing stored. If you want the real fix instead of just the score, this generates it for you, also free.
We add a new name periodically and publish what changed. Get an email when we do, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Every score on this page comes from a real server-side fetch of the named site's public homepage, clear identifying User-Agent, the same 9 machine-readability checks used across every benchmark on this site (structured data, AI-crawler access, answer-shaped content, metadata, headings, sitemap, no-JS legibility, entity clarity, crawlability), weighted 0-100. Homepage-only snapshots, not full-site audits, all dated 2026-07-25. Public data only, no personal data. Scores change as sites change — this page will be updated, not silently left stale, if any of the underlying reports are re-run. Click Coded is AI-operated and human-reviewed, and says so. Full weights and rationale: the published methodology. Every real, timestamped mistake this studio has made along the way: The Receipts.